<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Left Brain &#187; women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rfistudios.com/blogs/left-brain/tag/women/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rfistudios.com/blogs/left-brain</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:07:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to look at gender online (SFW)</title>
		<link>http://www.rfistudios.com/blogs/left-brain/2009/05/how-to-look-at-gender-online-sfw.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.rfistudios.com/blogs/left-brain/2009/05/how-to-look-at-gender-online-sfw.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#forwomen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital business trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rfistudios.com/blogs/left-brain/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americans for UNFPA (disclosure: client) works in the U.S. to support the United Nations Population Fund, the world&#8217;s largest multilateral source of funding for global women&#8217;s health. And tomorrow they are hosting a chat on Twitter to share ideas about global women&#8217;s health and rights.
(You can participate by adding #forwomen to the ideas you tweet, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.americansforunfpa.org/iam">Americans for UNFPA</a> (disclosure: client) works in the U.S. to support the United Nations Population Fund, the world&#8217;s largest multilateral source of funding for global women&#8217;s health. And tomorrow <a href="http://www.twitter.com/unfpa">they</a> are hosting a chat on <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a> to share ideas about global women&#8217;s health and rights.</p>
<p><em>(You can participate by adding #forwomen to the ideas you tweet, and you can watch the conversation at: <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23forwomen">http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23forwomen</a>.)</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;m excited to see where it leads and what the participation will be, as I have a hunch that there are a lot of people out there, particularly on Twitter, who will have a lot to say about the topic.</p>
<p>What does this have to do with digital business trends?</p>
<p>The connection is that there are <strong>new ways for companies to look at demographics online.</strong> The temptation with a topic like this would be to look first at the demographic and then at how to engage them.</p>
<p>But how we look at demographics is be changing. Online activities blend across demographics, and as Ruder Finn&#8217;s <a href="http://www.twitter.com/typennock">Director of Social Media</a> recently noted in an op-ed for PR Week, <a href="http://www.prweekus.com/Intent-is-the-new-demographic/article/130085/"><em>intent</em> is the new demographic</a>. </p>
<p>This means is that age, race, gender, etc, are not the only ways to determine how to reach a targeted audience online. First you have to look at what people are <em>doing</em> online, and only then can you get a better idea of who they are.</p>
<p>As PR Week&#8217;s Nicole Zerillo pointed out in her recent <a href="http://is.gd/IwnE">Marketers continue to fall into gender-stereotype traps</a> article:</p>
<blockquote><p>criticism demonstrates how companies – including well-funded, marketing-savvy ones – still struggle in determining the right way to market to women.</p></blockquote>
<p>The article highlights how &#8220;woman-targeted campaigns&#8221; don&#8217;t necessarily look at the underlying issues that create a need for the campaign in the first place.</p>
<p>The Wall Street Journal asked last week in &#8220;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124286245782441235.html">The Forgotten Market Online: Older Women</a>&#8220;:</p>
<blockquote><p>Are online marketers so youth-conscious &#8212; because it &#8220;feels right&#8221; &#8212; that they&#8217;re ignoring lucrative markets just when they&#8217;re most needed? The Internet is neither new nor young. The fastest-growing segment of Facebook users is women over 55, according to the Tracking Facebook blog. And the underlying assumption that young people are still the Web&#8217;s most fertile market doesn&#8217;t hold up to scrutiny.</p></blockquote>
<p>This underscores the need to look first at what people are using the Internet for, rather than who they are.</p>
<p>A recent <a href="http://is.gd/IwRn">study</a> from BlogHer, a leading online network for women, looks at <strong>where women go online to find trusted information</strong>. They found that women are twice as likely to go to blogs as opposed to social networking as trusted sources of information.</p>
<p>This survey combines the ideas of intent and demographic, by looking at intent <em>within</em> a demographic. </p>
<p>How do you think this research can help formulate your next PR campaign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rfistudios.com/blogs/left-brain/2009/05/how-to-look-at-gender-online-sfw.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
