Office Politics
September 18, 2008 | Written by
Think of the last 20 emails in your personal email inbox.
Is there anything in there you wouldn’t post publicly? Is there anything in there that could be considered illegal (besides offers to assist in Nigerian wire transfers)?
Well, Sarah Palin’s email was broken into Tuesday night, and hackers posted screenshots of her Yahoo! inbox and address book on Wikileaks.
Now, Palin has been accused of using personal email to conduct state business, possibly with the intention of avoiding Alaskan freedom of information laws. And while I would agree that the hack is a gross invasion of privacy, it’s gotten me to thinking about exactly how open people actually want to be when they trumpet transparency.
As we saw with the Facebook Beacon debacle, people only want to share information about themselves when they have great control over exactly what is shared. The same rules, however, can’t apply for elected officials, who constantly balance their personal and public lives (sort of like celebrities at LAX). Wikileaks forces us to balance our voyeuristic desires with the right to know of wrongdoing, and the cowardice of anonymous snitching.
Chances are you’ll never do anything that would land you on Wikileaks, however, here are three instances when we all might question the value of digital transparency on an everyday basis:
- Fundrace – Thanks to Web 2.0 and disclosure laws, I remember spending hours on Fundrace searching for friends, family and coworkers in 2004 to see who donated to campaigns. A quick spin through Silicon Valley donations this year shows some interesting results, including some that your corporate communications department might not want to be publicly associated with you company. For example, I find it scary how easily you can get the name and address of the only guy at Facebook who gave to a Republican campaign.
- LinkedIn – The New York Times recently explored using LinkedIn as a career safety net. The article appeared the same day that I speculated a client of ours was about to leave their job because their LinkedIn network increased dramatically (they did leave). Does this type of transparency help or hinder your career?
- Business is Personal – probably a more poignant question that my opening one would be to ask the opposite: would you want your work inbox posted publicly? Palin may have tried to escape the limelight by going to Yahoo!, but do you let your Yahoo! get into Outlook?
More from RFI Studios


Comments (2)
September 18th, 2008 at 8:22 pm Posted by Alison
There’s nothing in my work email that could incriminate me for anything serious. But that has more to do with my line of work than anything else. I do agree that a lot of people probably aren’t as comfortable with the idea of transparency as they would like to be, or think they should be, or want to look.
Personally, I try to keep my work and personal contact information separate. I can only think of one or two of my friends who have my work email address, and I don’t think any of them have my office number. (They could easily enough get these things, though.) Part of this is because it helps me to cut down on distractions while I’m working. And part of it is because I try to draw a strong line between my work and personal lives — there’s overlap, sure, but I’m not checking my work email and voicemail if I’m not on the clock. (OK, so I’m full time salaried, but you get the point.)
September 19th, 2008 at 10:19 am Posted by darius
interesting, thanks for the comment ally!
i think it also gets tough when you factor in a blackberry. mine tends to automatically choose the correct “from” address, but sometimes (like when using viigo), it will only let me send from my work email.
this has recently caused some personal emails to infiltrate my ruder finn account. but nothing illegal….yet!
Post Your Comment
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)